Re: [PATCH] Logging (filename) extensions

On 9/19/07, Fyodor wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 06:55:16AM -0500, Kris Katterjohn wrote:
> > On 9/18/07, Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman wrote:
> > >
> > Thanks guys, and I agree that a separate branch for bigger-than-bugfix and
> > non-massping-migration changes would be a good idea for now. I can't do it
> > right now as I'm not at my Linux box and I'm leaving for school in 20
> > minutes, but I think just "/nmap-exp/new-features" is good. I'll talk to
> > Fyodor about it later today if nobody's made it and he hasn't posted on
> > this.
>
> I'm all for a new features branch if developers find it convenient.
> It can be a good place to test things out. Though I'm fine with the
> traditonal approach of sending patches too.
>
> Even after the big stable release, we'll have to set a high bar for
> new features. Nmap has packed on a lot of weight over the summer and
> we need to let it settle a bit. But we can certainly let some things
> into the trunk as long as they are cool and/or unobtrusive enough to
> justify it.
>
> Cheers,
> -F
>

Would the LibNmap project allow the externalization of some of the
add-ons to keep the nmap.exe smaller with modules for extra features?
Or is it just for NSE scripts?

-Jason

_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Received on Wed Sep 19 2007 - 22:17:20 GMT